GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Go down

GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Admin- Michelle on Tue May 20, 2014 12:17 am

So who are his DNA parents ?

I am going with Tamara Fogle or Pip
and
William Van Cutsem
avatar
Admin- Michelle
Admin

Posts : 701
Join date : 2013-08-24

http://realroyalgossip.forumotion.co.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by GingerBeau46 on Tue May 20, 2014 2:48 pm

Will have to google some photos, very possible. He looks like someone, just can´t place who at the moment.
avatar
GingerBeau46
Baroness

Posts : 301
Join date : 2014-03-04

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by GingerBeau46 on Tue May 20, 2014 2:56 pm

So, who do we reckon was the surrogate, not that it matters who she was, just curious.
avatar
GingerBeau46
Baroness

Posts : 301
Join date : 2014-03-04

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Indie on Tue May 20, 2014 6:09 pm

If not Tamara then some random woman. However, I would love for it to be someone well known.

Indie
Duchess

Posts : 1060
Join date : 2014-03-03

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Royal Lowness on Wed May 21, 2014 8:55 pm

My guess: Tamara Fogle for the surrogate (and the real) mother. One of the Rothschilds for the father.

The boy has deep brown eyes, like his mother.
avatar
Royal Lowness
Lady

Posts : 83
Join date : 2013-09-01
Location : Glamis Castle

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Royal Lowness on Wed May 21, 2014 9:08 pm

avatar
Royal Lowness
Lady

Posts : 83
Join date : 2013-09-01
Location : Glamis Castle

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Romilly on Thu May 22, 2014 6:08 am

Admin wrote:So who are his DNA parents ?

I am going with Tamara Fogle or Pip
and
William Van Cutsem

Agree but not pip although on reflection he does have a nark eye a la pip!

Romilly
Princess

Posts : 862
Join date : 2014-03-03
Location : Hampshire

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Snow Kitten on Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:37 am

If you look at photos both have a bit of a nark eye, which makes it difficult to decide which one it is. Hope Fogle, a nice looking woman, pip is butt ugly.
avatar
Snow Kitten
Duchess

Posts : 1022
Join date : 2014-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Snow Kitten on Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:44 am

Royal Lowness wrote:

Love it RL, love it. Just about sums waity´s relationship with the kid doesn´t it. We saw how fast she shoves him back at the nanny on the "Down Under" trip. Cameras stop flashing, dumps the kid on nanny and waity and wimpy speed off in another car. Says it all really. I am thinking he spends most of his time with ma down at Doom Manor. Can´t be healthy having that kid around all those serial smokers either. I also read somewhere that willy smokes as well, which does not surprise me. That makes the kid a passive smoker. Nanny might smoke also, a lot of Spanish are heavy smokers.

Still find the fact that a supposed heir to the British Monarchy has a Spanish nanny. Nothing against Spanish nationality, but very odd for a supposed British heir. Nanny´s culture and history are Spanish, the kid´s culture and history are British. All very weird.
avatar
Snow Kitten
Duchess

Posts : 1022
Join date : 2014-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Indie on Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:01 pm

It's not weird if he's not a true Windsor now is it?

Indie
Duchess

Posts : 1060
Join date : 2014-03-03

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by PaulineB on Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:21 pm

Very perceptive comments Sno. I don't want to be rude to the Spanish nanny as she probably has a hard enough time being barked at by Ma Mids but she (the nanny) does have the face of a heavy smoker. Some nefarious reason a Spanish one was chosen rather than the traditional British one. You have a good point Indie, he isn't a Windsor.

PaulineB
Princess

Posts : 590
Join date : 2014-05-28

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Indie on Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:32 pm

When will Charles make a move on correcting this situation?

Indie
Duchess

Posts : 1060
Join date : 2014-03-03

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by GingerBeau46 on Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:28 pm

Not sure they ever will out it. Best they will do is somehow remove waity and sprog into oblivion with some trumped up reason for the fake kid to be taken out of line of succession. If they come clean it will cause such an horrendous fall out for the monarchy. Probably all peddling like mad beneath the surface to try and sort out what can be done. The surrogacy gossip, rumour and speculation is world wide now, and no hiding it. Unlike years ago, when all things could be hidden and no questions asked of the royal, the times have changed. So much in on the internet alone. All very well to photoshop the photos, but by the time that is done a lot of people will have already downloaded the originals to external hard drive, so they will still exist. The internet is a wonderful thing until it works against you.

Or, if someone publishes a "Tell All", not that is something different altogether, be interesting to see when that happens, as it will eventually.
avatar
GingerBeau46
Baroness

Posts : 301
Join date : 2014-03-04

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Snow Kitten on Wed Jun 04, 2014 3:16 pm

HAPPY BIRTHDAY GEORGIE (not cambridge, but who?)

Oh wait, maybe not today, might be July. All very confusing this.  Wonder if his bio parents will turn up, be nice for them to see what a grump a lump he has turned into.  Second thoughts, cancel the cake, the kid is fat enough, it doesn´t need the extra calories.
avatar
Snow Kitten
Duchess

Posts : 1022
Join date : 2014-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Rozel on Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:37 am

Waity takes the kid to the polo. Strange no photo with Uncle Harry, and willy boy just about manages to give him a sip of water. Wonder if waity took him in retaliation to not being allowed to parade him on the balcony at BP at Trooping of the Colour. No grandparents or great grandparents around. And it was father's day, for real fathers of course, not fake ones. Waity looks rough in these, photos, especially the one holding the ball. See the kid is walking fine on his own, defo looks as though his birth date was 4 June. Love also the comparison pic with willy boy and kid photo .

http://newsitems.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/This-Sunday-Is-Prince-William%E2%80%99s-First-Father%E2%80%99s-Day-2-620x397.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/15/article-2658394-1ECA1EB600000578-274_470x734.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/15/article-2658394-1ECA305900000578-949_964x695.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/15/article-2658394-1ECA69CD00000578-687_964x1170.jpg

Willy boy at 14 months
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1202104/thumbs/o-PRINCE-WILLIAM-TODDLER-570.jpg?7

A comparison photo
http://newsitems.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/This-Sunday-Is-Prince-William%E2%80%99s-First-Father%E2%80%99s-Day-2-620x397.jpg

avatar
Rozel
Princess

Posts : 936
Join date : 2014-06-04

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Rozel on Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:39 am

Links to both articles where the above piccies come from. I see the astroturfers are out big time, wouldn't like the midd account for this lot.

http://newsitems.com/this-sunday-is-prince-williams-first-fathers-day/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2658394/Crawling-Prince-George-takes-cautious-steps-mothers-arms-Fathers-Day-outing-polo.html
avatar
Rozel
Princess

Posts : 936
Join date : 2014-06-04

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Indie on Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:35 am

In that last comparison photo posted by Rozel, the giant has a very knowing expression on his face. I don't think I've ever seen a baby look like that before. Weird.

Indie
Duchess

Posts : 1060
Join date : 2014-03-03

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Snow Kitten on Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:03 pm

This one from the same article shows you how tall the kid is stood next to waity. Actually, looking at the article yet again, I noticed the photo of waity holding he kid whilst wielding some long stick thing. That kid must weight a ton, and yet she holds him as she wields the stick. I also recall waity bailing out of an engagement way back at the beginning of the "marriage" saying she was allergic to horses. Doesn´t look it here does she, last photo.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/15/article-2658394-1ECA1D7C00000578-343_470x633.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/15/article-2658394-1ECA2F2600000578-359_964x639.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/15/article-2658394-1ECA394E00000578-449_964x591.jpg
avatar
Snow Kitten
Duchess

Posts : 1022
Join date : 2014-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Snow Kitten on Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:16 am

I have to say, in light of the current ongoing situation, I find it rather strange that supposedly HM approved a coin to be minted for the fake kids first birthday. More lies and spin? Not done for willy middleton or chuck, so why mint one for the fake kid?

Wonder how many will buy it, be surprised if many. 5 pound coin costing 80 pounds. Still loads of commemorative stuff selling at half price on the Royal Online shop, the whole range did not sell well at all. It was very over-priced, like this coin. Seriously, who wants to buy a coin of a kid they are not allowed to see, and who is not even a legal heir to the throne. Waste of money in my opinion.

http://royalcentral.co.uk/other/georgecoin-32712
avatar
Snow Kitten
Duchess

Posts : 1022
Join date : 2014-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Admin- Michelle on Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:22 am

Or if it sells, it is because the truth is coming out and that stuff will be worth a fortune
avatar
Admin- Michelle
Admin

Posts : 701
Join date : 2013-08-24

http://realroyalgossip.forumotion.co.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Indie on Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:58 pm

Maybe the old queen thinks in her little slow to act mind that if the coin comes out with the lab baby on it then the sheeple will buy into the legitimacy of the little brute with his Indian eyes.

Indie
Duchess

Posts : 1060
Join date : 2014-03-03

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Snow Kitten on Sat Jul 19, 2014 10:22 pm

Will be interesting to find out just how many of those coins are sold. at 80 pounds sterling a go for a five pound sterling coin, there is a recession, and not many people are bothered about fakie porgie, plus a lot are now tuned in to the surrogacy. A lot of the "arrival" stuff on the royal website did not sell, and in fact some of it is still on sale at 50% discount, be doing a bogof soon (buy one get one free) and bet they still have them on their hands.

We still don´t know george who? but getting a lot closer, very close now. That time bomb is gearing up.  affraid 
avatar
Snow Kitten
Duchess

Posts : 1022
Join date : 2014-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: GEORGE WHO ? not Cambridge

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum