Royal Christmas 2014

Here we have it  - today the annual Christmas Lunch for the extended royals that HM does not get to see often, if at all, during the year.

Wily by and waity there, with waity looking as though she was wearing a pair of earrings from Accessorize or some such place, usual gurning, manical grin.  No idea who was in the back seat, initially I thought the nanny but no, because

One member of the Royal Family who missed out on the Buckingham Palace lunch was Prince George, who stayed behind at Kensington Palace with his nanny, Maria Theresa Borallo.

And were we not told the odious couple were already living at AH?  But

The 16-month-old royal and his parents are also due to relocate to Anmer Hall on the Sandringham Estate where an extended nursery big enough for two babies has been prepared.

More money us poor taxpayers are spending on an extended nursery for a second fake.

Also, have we not already been told that the medd family, complete with pa and his sumo suit, are spending Christmas Day at AH with the odious couple, with them going to the main house for the church walk and then adjourning back to AH for lunch with the medds?  Or have I got that wrong.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2877594/A-Christmas-feast-fit-Queen-Royals-including-William-Kate-Harry-descend-Buckingham-Palace-festive-lunch.html

Jeepers, yesterday the press were saying fakie 17 months old, today 16 months old. We might get correct articles one day. Any fool can work out he is 17 months old next week.

No surprise there are conflicting reports re Christmas day. Knowing how greedy and grasping the medds are I can´t see them missing out on a Christmas Day at AH, particularly with the servants doing all the work, suut ma down to the ground acting like lady muck. Bet the servants will be glad when they leave, although no doubt it will give them all a good laugh "below stairs", can just imagine them imitating that odious family, and laughing their socks off.

How strange. DM now showing a photo of fakie allegedly being driven in to BP with the odious couple and nanny Maria.  Note that he looks very little like the fakie we were shown in the recent "official" photos, eye shape difference immediately noticeable.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/12/17/241F630200000578-2877594-image-m-172_1418836528631.jpg

And yet this below was a DM pic at 14.33 of lazy duo and nanny in car, so where was sprog, car seat?  Not there are they.  Very odd.  And at that point the DM article said fakie was left back at KP.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/12/17/241F559800000578-2877594-image-m-162_1418831136603.jpg

So, photo without fakie was showing on the DM at 14.33, just three adults, with no sign of a car seat, fakie nothing.  Then later on we get another piccie of fakie with nanny allegedly with the odious couple in the car and you can see the car seat and of course fakie quite clearly, plus nanny very close to him, but not the odious couple.

Is someone -  now let me think, no couldn´t be juggernaut surely, trying to make us think fakie was at the Christmas party.  When I read the DM there was no photo of fakie in that article and it stated that fakie was at home with his nanny, which I thought odd at the time having seen the odious couple plus nanny in the car minus fakie.

Also this was posted

Mark Stewart@Regaleyes
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have arrived at the Queen's family Christmas Lunch. No sign of Prince George.

Another juggernaut failure it would appear, throwing that photo in and trying to make us think fakie was at the lunch.  Trouble is some of us have good memories, and when I read that DM article at 14.33 that fakie photo was not on it, and note how now it is the first photo shown in the article.

Oh dear, and I can´t be the only one who has noticed it either can I, about time the press learned that the public are not stupid and can´t be fobbed off with lies all the time.

Staff saying Fakie definitely not there and all a set up to make it look as if he was. Why are they trying to convince us he is in contact with the Queen when even those across the other side of the world knows he is not and for what reasons too!! He who protests too much again and all with juggers crazy bogus scenarios.

Ha ha ha  -  be sure your sins will find you out.  Doubt the odious couple were in that car with fakie, hence we never saw them.  And taking nanny with them in the first instance was a ruse for us to think fakie was there.   It would appear from Twitter that fakie was swimming at BP around the same time (what a coincidence - not).  Anything to try and make us think he was invited to the Xmas lunch with them.

Smells just like the taking fakie swimming at BP on the morning of his alleged "first birthday", in truth allowing the public to think he was visiting HM or PP, which was definitely not the case.  Always up to a good scam aren´t they.  I would have thought they would have given up by now, they are always caught out.

Talking about Twitter, I was looking at this page today, you need to scroll down and keep reading, quite a few tweets, but quite interesting re the odious couple and how they verbally bash one another all the time. Worth a read.

https://twitter.com/RoyalForumMoron/with_replies

Update: On looking back at the photos, I think it might have been Rebecca Deacon in the back of the car on the way to the BP lunch. It was defo nanny in car with fakie, which confused me, but then I remember waity, Rebecca Deacon and nanny all have a similar look. So no, fakie defo not at the BP lunch.

Queen and family at church on Sunday 28 December. Phew, bet they were furtively looking around to make sure the medds were not there! Seriously, were we not led to believe that the medds are fervent church -goers? More pr spin to make them look good.

http://yournewswire.com/china-steps-in-as-worlds-new-bank/