Fakie georgie porgie on Vanity Fair cover with willy boy and waity

Well, I knew VF was going downhill and turning into a trash mag these days, but putting this lazy shower on the front cover, not sure it will do much for their sales figures.

Methinks this is a ma medd pr stunt, it has her stamp all over it, and let us not forget that flat face "worsk" for them. It has certainly not come from BP or Clarence House. Pushing the limits again, why does ma keep doing that, it very rarely works - or at least it does, but against her not for her.

Style icon? Media star? PR triumph? They jest do they not. As for breastfeeding, you have be pregnant and deliver a baby to produce milk. And what about the Waitrose trip with the trolley filled with pizza and bottles of wine and no doubt cigarettes for her to smoke. Whoever writes these articles makes themselves look utterly ridiculous.

Oh, and they are supposedly working on a sibling for old fakie this summer. Does the surrogate know yet, and have the donors been lined up. Need one without brown eyes this time, big slip up with porgie.

Intro to the article, that was enough for me, so vomit inducing I coudn´t read any more, not even seen the photo, I already know he looks nothing like either of them,, although maybe I should, he was showing good signs of who he looks like in the polo pictures.

“As Prince George prepares to celebrate his first birthday, Vanity Fair contributor Katie Nicholl speaks to palace insiders about how the prince has become a media star, a style icon, and a P.R. triumph. Reporting on how their son has upended William’s and Kate’s lives, Nicholl gives a behind-the-scenes look at George’s first year, the search for their new nanny, the palace redecoration, and the family’s New Zealand and Australian adventures.”

http://www.inquisitr.com/1340456/prince-george-nabs-vanity-fair-cover-story-his-bouts-with-colic-and-when-he-might-get-a-sibling/

Hi there   

It's me, 'starsailor' from the other forum. Thank you for the account here, it's a great forum.

As for that cover, I think that it looks too fake. And I think that they 'photo-shopped' George's lips and nose. And we know why...

Hi Starsailor, and welcome, so pleased you have hopped over. We have freedom of speech here and a friendly way, rudeness and pouncing on people if you do not agree with their opinions is not our way. We can all agree to differ in a pleasant way - and maybe some lively, but friendly, debates!

I could not bring myself to view the VF article in full, so vomit inducing. I have heard that it is a rehash of some of the Australian tour photos, and obviously photoshopped from what you have said. Actually, if the photoshopping has been done from an Oz photo might be worth comparing with the original.

I think that is why the royals do not like him seen very much, they of all people will know whose looks he favours, and it sure isn´t the lazy couple.

Again, welcome aboard    

Hi Rozel,

Thank you

I agree with you, the other forum is not what it used to be. Yooper, the moderator, got out of control and is threatening anyone who doesn't agree with them.

As for the VF article, I only took a look at the cover and that is already vomit-inducing. You are right, the picture seems to be from the tour. His nose definitely looks bulbous. Well, I guess they try to make him look like 'his mother'.

Welcome Starsailor, I loved your posts on the other forum and hope you keep posting here. A great forum as no nastiness, good posts and information and always up to the minute. A great mod too.

Hi Pauline,

Thanks! Was your user name also Pauline on the other forum? I remember some of us 'old' members. We used to have interesting discussions there. But it's not that great anymore.

Welcome starsailor. No that is a different Paula/line to the other forum.

I read on cover of a mag that PG is running around, up and down stairs etc
and he only just learnt to walk ? so we have gone from being carried to running at 11 months. Mine walked under 12 months and my daughter was running up and down stairs at 9 months BUT she did not go from arms to running

You are right, Georgie is very advanced for his age. I posted a theory on the other forum a while ago. This is what I posted in the surrogate thread (feel free to move this post):

There is a one simple way on how to pull off a surrogacy and to fake the delivery. Just think about it... it's really easy. You need a surrogate and someone who would act as a decoy. So you implant the fertilized egg cell into the surrogate and she starts to carry the child.
Meanwhile the other person, who is going to be the 'decoy', is also pregnant, but not with twins. Let's say it's a usual pregnancy. And perhaps the decoy got pregnant after the surrogate, which means that the surrogate is going to deliver her child before the decoy is going to deliver her child.

Let's say the surrogate gave birth one month or a few weeks before the decoy. Then all you have to do is to wait for the decoy to give birth. So you rush into the hospital exactly at the same time when the decoy is being rushed into the hospital. Then a third person, for example someone who would visit the decoy, would bring the baby (the one delivered by the surrogate) into the hospital during that time.

While KM would be faking the delivery, she would be in fact just waiting for TF to give birth. Then someone could secretly bring TF's baby into KM's room and the baby from the surrogate would stay with TF (just temporarily) in order not to raise suspicion. The deception would be perfect. KM and Willy could step out in front of the press with the newborn and pretend that it's George. Later on they could just 'return' TF's baby after they arrive at home. And TF would give them George (the baby delivered by the surrogate) during that meeting.

KM and TF had private suites with enclosed private delivery rooms. It would be easy to 'switch' the babies temporarily. All you need is two physicians (one for KM and the other one for TF), someone who would bring in George (could be a relative or close friend) and perhaps some other staff who would be 'in the know' in order to help in the deception.

If the surrogate and KM were at the same time at the hospital, it would be suspicious if suddenly the baby of the surrogate would be missing. By faking a delivery while TF is really giving birth, and someone else 'smuggling' George into the hospital, no baby would be missing and hence it wouldn't look suspicious. KM would be able to 'present' a newborn while George would stay with TF for a bit.

This is just one scenario. I guess that something along this line must have happened. It would explain why George is much bigger than other kids who are 9 months old. And also why KM was hiding in Berkshire while being 'overdue', but refused to go to the hospital in order to stay there just in case. I think she was basically waiting for TF to rush into the hospital. Well, what a coincidence that she 'gave birth' at the same time and place as TF did. And what a coincidence that TF and KM got 'pregnant' at the same time, and that a fertility specialist is related to the Fogles.


In that scenario TF could also be the egg donor (hence the dark brown eyes). Well, this scenario is one possibility. Like in those movies where two women give birth at the same time, but their babies are being switched at the hospital. In this case Fakey had to present a newborn, but since George was probably already older, they had to pretend that TF's baby is George in front of the press. And then of course 'return' him to TF later on.

I agree that the timing was odd and PG was born in June, or earlier
I agree that PG could be smuggled in and a surrogate with a missing baby would send red alert.

He was all but walking in Australia/New Zealand when supposedly 9 months old,  and walking at the polo in mid-June, albeit with the pretence of waity holding his hand.  Remember all that kicking and trying to get down on that tourl.  I still remain convinced that his birthday was 4 June and that ma was the surrogate, nobody will alter my mind on that one.

The photo of the kid on VF front cover, this is the original on the internet, they seem to have altered the colour of his hair and made his nose a bit bigger and those horrid jowls more noticeable.

http://mylusciouslife.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/The-Duke-and-Duchess-of-Cambridge-visit-Taronga-Zoo-in-Sydney-with-Prince-George.jpg

Another Oz tour photo, a trilogy, and he looks nothing like the lazy couple in any of them. Also note the size of him, and those strong, muscular legs, for a 9 month old.

http://i1.wp.com/royal-fans.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/prince-george-stylish-tot-z.jpg

^
Hmm... Ma as the surrogate? How old is she now? A young woman would be a better surrogate, but you never know... the midds would do anything in order not to lose the royal connection.

You are right, George must be much older. Do you remember when they went to meet the group of parents in NZ? George was much more advanced than all the other children.

Yes, the playdate, and all the babies there were the same age as the kid within a week or two. It was said that most of the parents were surprised at how large he was and how much more advanced than any of the others.

Women of ma´s age can have babies, loads of info on the net. Sometimes it is just a case of giving a woman HRT treatment for several months, or there is also some expensive treatment you can have. She was also missing in action for a few months at the required time last year, resurfacing at Wimbledon with a much fuller figure and looking totally exhausted. Would also explain being down at medd manor post birth if he was being breastfed by her, always thought that was odd.

If waity is infertile, it might be that ma was having treatment for several months before nudegate, who knows. So much we don´t know, but somebody does, and it will come out for the right price. As they say, money talks - the more money the more they talk, and whoever explodes this time bomb is in to make a mint of money.

Google carole middleton Lindo Wing steps, she looks like a recently delivered older mother, and loose frocks at Wimbers. They often say look right under your nose and the answer is there don´t they. Could be wrong, but too much fits in. We were also bombarded with photos of the flat faced orange one for months on end, always wondered why, but could well have been a smoke screen to hide the fact ma was MIA. Who knows, with that lot anything is possible.

Hi Starsailor, and welcome.  So pleased you have joined us. We are, I hope, a friendly bunch and we like the truth, plain and unvarnished.  Some of us have differing thoughts and opinions, and that is what  life is all about, that does not mean pleasantness is to be forgotten.  Hope you very much enjoy being an active member of the forum, look forward to seeing more of your comments.  

Meant to say, you are probably still reading around on the forum, but I think there is quite a bit of info re surrogacy etc in the topics under the wimpo and waity main thread on the home page.