Waity the serial exhibitionist. From girlfriend to wife

Since cooking dinner is now delayed because of my gag reflex.  I have to wonder, at what point during the exercise of getting dressed do you forget to put on some undies.  Is there some reason she needs to air it out????  Is there some pathological sickness that causes her to need to flash????  Is this Bill's revenge on the RF?????  Has she sprayed this area with Teflon and is not able to notice the wind????  Blechhhhhhhh!!!!  My eyes need bleach. Oh and is it not beyond pathetic that his is the first news she has made since coming back from OZ/NZ???

One of the Peasants wrote:Since cooking dinner is now delayed because of my gag reflex.  I have to wonder, at what point during the exercise of getting dressed do you forget to put on some undies.  Is there some reason she needs to air it out????  Is there some pathological sickness that causes her to need to flash????  Is this Bill's revenge on the RF?????  Has she sprayed this area with Teflon and is not able to notice the wind????  Blechhhhhhhh!!!!  My eyes need bleach.  Oh and is it not beyond pathetic that his is the first news she has made since coming back from OZ/NZ???

OMG...crying....classic OOTP... A zillion stars for you   

Running on Sky News through the day -
Kay Burley rather sarcastic - couldn't stop grinning - Paul Royal correspondent tried to keep a straight face and sort of made light of it whilst slipping in that the pics could be found on the Internet etc etc. KB suggested she needed a 6 pack of Granny knickers!


Sent from my iPhone

And a paperbag for that ugly head

Ooookay....I just saw that photo link posted by OOTP.
You all really think there is no thong? I mean a thong is the minimal of under wears, granted...but you mean not even one tiny thong under that dress?

Lord have mercy!  

Am in two minds.The read coat off plane in NZ there was nothing. She had a brazillian, nasty rash and all. So I am guessing no. If no, there are much bigger issues at hand

Duquesa de Azúcar wrote:Ooookay....I just saw that photo link posted by OOTP.
You all really think there is no thong? I mean a thong is the minimal of under wears, granted...but you mean not even one tiny thong under that dress?

Lord have mercy!  

She makes me feel sick - every time I see a pic of her I think of cro...es - sorry girls I just can't help it - it's called association of ideas

Admin wrote:Am in two minds.The read coat off plane in NZ there was nothing. She had a brazillian, nasty rash and all. So I am guessing no. If no, there are much bigger issues at hand

Please - it's way tooo much detail - yuk

There is no reason not to wear knickers/panties .
Unless your house caught on fire while you were under shower and you had to run with just a bathrobe on.

Duquesa de Azúcar wrote:Ooookay....I just saw that photo link posted by OOTP.
You all really think there is no thong? I mean a thong is the minimal of under wears, granted...but you mean not even one tiny thong under that dress?

Lord have mercy!  

I really don't know DoS...It says something about waity when the most talked about topic is whether the silly cow wears underwear or not..I mean really!!! On that awful day three years ago, I honestly would not have said that three years on, the most riveting discussion about her would about her underwear or lack of!!! What an absolute waste of space she is

Wonderful, wonderful. The subject on GREMB is the weather expected in Normandy on June 6.
It has been predicted that it will be "stormy", to which one poster normally very correct replied
"May they should send a message to BP to be passed on to the Duchess of Cambridge."
A further exchange inquiring whether she has now revealed a full frontal, everything?
Very correct though they are they must be bursting to reallly have a go at her.and reveal her MO.

Well if a pensioner in Oz can shout out 'surrogate' (albeit marched off for doing so) I am sure the French can shout out 'crotchgate' or the French version of it! They must be longing to get their own back.

PaulineB - where did you see/hear about the pensioner? I must have taken my eye of the ball!!

Doesn´t appear as though she was wearing a thong. Even if she was, it is not appropriate underwear for a public engagement, especially when arrival and departure are by helicopter. I am convinced she travels up and down to Berkshire in a helicopter, so she of all people knows the drill, so to wear a full skirted frock, no slip or knickers, then it was deliberate. As for calling her a hot mess in the Mirror, it is fairly obviously from that alone that the Mirror employ staff with little or no intelligence. Gutter rag is the correct title for that publication, have called that many times. Bit like down to sewer level now.

^ Already in the sewer I'd say. She knows the drill OK re helicopters/clothing but given that we have agreed she is an exhibitionist maybe she gives the crew an eyeful everytime she goes home to the MoD/back to KP

You know she gives the crew an eyeful on purpose and gets a huge cheap freak thrill from it.

Maybe she is learning at last althohugh this coat looked so heavy it couldn't fly up in a hurricane
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=newssearch&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCwQqQIoADAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmetro.co.uk%2F2014%2F05%2F29%2Fduchess-of-cambridge-may-have-finally-invested-in-weights-for-her-skirt-after-flashing-her-bum-4744092%2F&ei=7WaMU4euNYmZO43SgfAK&usg=AFQjCNGcbW6vJGwaF8BzEj2nBEfSOxZ9-A&bvm=bv.67720277,d.ZWU

Surely this can't be true ?!!
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=newssearch&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDoQqQIoADAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nydailynews.com%2Fnews%2Fworld%2Fkate-middleton-bottom-minder-article-1.1812323&ei=7WaMU4euNYmZO43SgfAK&usg=AFQjCNHizGoQQkpNBcoFiMgnZ5PZntdUuQ

LOL Thanks for article.
She's the one who should mind her manners not the photographers. They just take photos of what is there---her exposed buttocks among other "things".  

Bet she did not have a choice, queenie´s dressmaker would have been working overtime to get them sewn in. Sorry flasher, your days of exposing your very ugly naked body are over, one exposure too many this time. Too bad we all have vivid memories, and photos on the internet, of what has been exposed, and not pretty sights either.  

Her over exposed body is ugly.

Indie wrote:You know she gives the crew an eyeful on purpose and gets a huge cheap freak thrill from it.

Waity is a natural exhibitionist, the porn industry is full of them and they know all about cheap thrills too!   

Get rid of this freak!

GingerBeau46 wrote:Bet she did not have a choice, queenie´s dressmaker would have been working overtime to get them sewn in. Sorry flasher, your days of exposing your very ugly naked body are over, one exposure too many this time. Too bad we all have vivid memories, and photos on the internet, of what has been exposed, and not pretty sights either.  

As we get older our memories are supposed to deteriorate - every cloud has a silver lining then!!

My memories never deteriorate. I'm stuck with those images forever. Poor Me.